State v. Koetting
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
A jury found appellant guilty of the offense of “harassment” under § 565.090.1(2), RSMo 1978,1 and assessed his punishment at confinement for a period of one year under § 558.011.1(5). Judgment was entered accordingly, and the appeal therefrom challenges the constitutionality of said statutory provisions.
The information, in part, alleged that appellant “. .. for the purpose of disturbing Helen Bax made a telephone call to said Helen Bax and in so doing used the following coarse language offensive to one of average sensibility: ‘I have $10.00 if you have a piece of ass’.”
Evidence was offered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. MolandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. PresleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. KoettingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.