Commonwealth v. Aikens, M., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUSTICE BAER
This appeal requires the Court to determine the proper grading for sentencing of a defendant’s conviction for unlawful con tact with a minor, 18 Pa.C.S. § 6318, 1 when the grading is based on the offense for which the defendant contacted the minor, here involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (IDSI), but where the jury ultimately acquitted the defendant of that substantive offense. Here, because the trial court instructed the jury that if it concluded the purpose of contacting the minor was to engage in IDSI, Appellant would be guilty of unlawful contact with a minor, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. BullockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. MaglioccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SamuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Baker-MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Aikens, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Baizar, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Baker-Myers, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Baker-Myers, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.