Legal Opinion

Christmas v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2014No. 2011-CT-01311-SCTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

LAMAR, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Tom and Consandra Christmas own property neighboring an alligator-infested, waste-disposal site owned by Exxon. They sued Exxon, claiming the alligator infestation was a nuisance. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Exxon, based on the statute of limitations and the prior-trespass doctrine. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. We find that Exxon is entitled to summary *125judgment, but for different reasons than those found by the circuit court.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. A waste-disposal site has been located…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc. v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Anglado v. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Prescott v. Leaf River Forest ProductsMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Sickman v. United States (Two Cases). Ryal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. Briggs v. BenjaminMississippi Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lakeland Seniors, LLC v. The University of Mississippi Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2024
  2. Steve Allen, Harry Allen and Hunter Allen v. Steven Featherstone Dickerson, Alyson Lee Dickerson, Individually and as Next Best Friend for Minor Children G.D. and E.D.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API