Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Witt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 9, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Tazewell county in an action of trespass on the ease. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries alleged by the plaintiff to have been sustained by him as a *118result of the negligence of the defendant railway company. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, which this writ of error brings under review.

In the view we take of .the ease it is only necessary to consider the last assignment of error which calls in question the action of the circuit court in refusing to set aside the verdict of the jury as contrary to the law and the evidence.

The record shows that two crews of section hands, near Maxwell station…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consumers' Brewing Co. v. Doyle's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. Hall's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Cromer's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  4. Moore Lime Co. v. Johnston's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. McDonald's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. H. Jacoby Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  2. Dixie Peanut Co. v. Lewis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  3. Yellow Poplar Lumber Co. v. GobleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API