Legal Opinion

People v. Patterson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1989No. S006538PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

The issue before us is whether the second degree felony-murder doctrine applies to a defendant who, in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11352, furnishes cocaine to a person who dies as a result of ingesting it. We reaffirm the rule that, in determining whether a felony is inherently dangerous to human life under the second degree felony-murder doctrine, we must consider “the elements of the felony in the *618abstract, not the particular ‘facts’ of the case.” (People v. Williams (1965) 63 Cal.2d 452, 458, fn. 5 [47 Cal.Rptr. 7, 406 P.2d 647].) While Health and Safety…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. ChiuCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. DykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API