Legal Opinion

Mollerson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered on or about March 7, 2003, which granted the municipal defendants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action and for untimely notice of *71the new claims asserted, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 1, 2003, which denied plaintiffs’ motion denominated as one for renewal and reargument, deemed to be from the denial from a motion to reargue only, and, so considered, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lauer v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Dillon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Grieshaber v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Biro v. Department of Social Services/ Human Resources AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rush v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Ferreira v. Cellco PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Ferreira v. Cellco PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Rush v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API