Legal Opinion

Childs v. Mays

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1889No. 2646PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Freestone. Tried below before Hon. Sam E. Frost.

1Opinion of the Court

Henry, Associate Justice.—

This is a suit upon á promissory note for $550. Appellants* petition described it as a note for $500. When it ■was offered in evidence it was excluded on account of the variance, and plaintiffs took a nonsuit unconditionally. Within two days they filed a motion to set aside the judgment of dismissal. During the same term the judgment of dismissal was set aside and the cause reinstated upon plaintiffs paying all costs accrued up to that date. Afterward plaintiffs .amended, correctly describing their cause of action. At the time of the *77nonsuit more than four years had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shields v. BooneTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Hughes v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. in Re State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Mitchell v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lawless v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Cotton v. H. S. Lyter & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API