Legal Opinion

State v. Roach

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 19, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On exceptions. Search and seizure. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

The complaint alleges that the liquors were kept or deposited in the town of Sandford.. The proof was that it was-in the town of Lebanon. The ruling at the trial was, that Hie-variance between allegation and proof was not material. We-think it was material. The offense was in its nature and consequences local. The place must be proved as laid, "where the■ penalty is given to the poor of a town or place where the offense • is committed.” 3 Green!. Ev. § 12. In this case the vessels, containing the liquors became forfeited to the town, whore the liquors were seized. B. S., c. 27, § 39. All the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Spirituous LiquorsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API