Legal Opinion

(PS) Zamanieh Shahri v. USCIS Sacramento Field Office

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 25, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01571Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEYED SAEID ZAMANIEH SHAHRI, No. 2:21-cv-1571 TLN DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 USCIS SACRAMENTO FIELD OFFICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 15 SECURITY, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Seyed Saeid Zamanieh Shahri is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter 19 was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and

28 U.S.C. § 20

636(b)(1). Pending before the Court are defendant’s motion to remand to the United States 21 Citizenship and Immigration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mobile Diagnostic Imagine, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API