Donohue v. County of Erie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint because Michael B. Donohue (plaintiff) failed to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h. That section permits the commencement of an action if the plaintiff is not examined within 90 days of service of a demand for oral examination. The action may not be commenced, however, if the plaintiff* fails to appear at the examination or requests an adjournment or postponement beyond the 90-day period (General Municipal Law § 50-h [5]).
Plaintiff failed to comply with defendant County’s demand *1084for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kowalski v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Bailey v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Ambroziak v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gravius v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- GRAVIUS, DEBORAH I. v. COUNTY OF ERIEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Gravius v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011