Legal Opinion

Donohue v. County of Erie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint because Michael B. Donohue (plaintiff) failed to comply with General Municipal Law § 50-h. That section permits the commencement of an action if the plaintiff is not examined within 90 days of service of a demand for oral examination. The action may not be commenced, however, if the plaintiff* fails to appear at the examination or requests an adjournment or postponement beyond the 90-day period (General Municipal Law § 50-h [5]).

Plaintiff failed to comply with defendant County’s demand *1084for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kowalski v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Bailey v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Ambroziak v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gravius v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. GRAVIUS, DEBORAH I. v. COUNTY OF ERIEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Gravius v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API