Legal Opinion

Lessard v. Great Falls Woolen Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 2, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

It is conceded that the injury to the minor was due to the defendant’s negligence and that independent rights of action accrued, one in the minor for the injury, and the other in the father for the loss of services. The principal issues raised by the exceptions have to do only with (1) the period for which recovery for loss of services may be had, and (2) the proper parties plaintiff.

1. The court ruled that there could be no recovery after the date of the appointment of the brother as guardian on the ground that such appointment, as a matter of law, terminated parental control and, per…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. Flippin v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Beaudoin v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Nichols Ex Rel. Estate of Nichols v. EstabrookDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1989
  5. In re Jessie E.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API