Legal Opinion
In re the Personal Restraint of Delgado
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 10, 2009No. 35455-1-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*227¶1 Christopher Delgado and Ernesto Meza seek relief from personal restraint imposed after the State charged deadly weapon sentencing enhancements and the jury entered deadly weapon special findings, but the sentencing court imposed firearm enhancements. A panel of judges reviewed the petitions in order to consider the implications of our Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Recuenco, 163 Wn.2d 428, 180 P.3d 1276 (2008) (Recuenco III).
Quinn-Brintnall, J.
¶2 In Recuenco III, our Supreme Court held that the State cannot elect to charge a deadly weapon sentence enhancement and send deadly…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In Re Personal Restraint of RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- In re the Personal Restraint of RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.