Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. City of Schenectady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 2003PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Spain, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for injuries alleg*126edly sustained when she tripped on a crack in a sidewalk located outside premises owned by defendant Rose Nejman in the City of Schenectady, Schenectady County. The complaint alleges that defendants failed to “properly inspect, repair and maintain” the damaged sidewalk. The record reveals that the sidewalk had been in need of repair since defendant City of Schenectady removed a tree stump from the site approximately six years prior to plaintiffs accident. Based on plaintiffs admissions that she was aware…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Tagle v. JakobNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Di Ponzio v. RiordanNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Peralta v. HenriquezNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Cupo v. KarfunkelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Westbrook v. WR Activities-Cabrera MarketsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Soich v. FaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Tulovic v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Timmins v. BenjaminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API