Legal Opinion

Ex parte Allen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Petition for Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

— The grounds whereon the petitioner relies for his discharge from the custody of the warden of *535the penitentiary is that the proceedings had in the criminal court in Lafayette county, which resulted in his conviction, sentence and consequent incarceration, are without warrant of law, and therefore void. This claim has for its basis that the act of May 19th, 1877, (Sess. Acts of that year, p. 217,) is only applicable to circuit courts, eo nomwr, and not to those possessing merely jurisdiction for the punishment of crimes, as in the case at bar. Section 29, article 6, of the present…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte SnyderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. State ex rel. Speck v. GeigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Von Stade v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. State v. KringSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API