Legal Opinion

Russ v. Stockstill

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1929No. 28043 1/2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

Buss, Dozier, and Puyer, appellants here, exhibited their bill in the lower court for an injunction against J. E. Stockstill and Arthur J. Smith, sheriff. On the filing of the bill, a temporary injunction was granted by the chancellor and served on Stockstill and the sheriff. On final hearing, on bill, answer, and proof, the injunction Avas dissolved and the bill dismissed. The gravamen of the appellant’s bill is that there was no valid judgment upon which the execution sought to be levied on their property could be based. In other words, that the execution was without any judgment to support…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Courtney Bros. v. John Deere Plow Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Steadman v. ButlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gotelli v. FountainMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stockstill v. CampbellMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tillotson v. AndersMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Eubanks v. W. H. Hodges & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API