Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Douglas Fir Plywood Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff filed this action for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident involving plaintiff’s car and a truck driven by defendant Stidham and owned by his employer, defendant Douglas Fir Plywood Company, which was also plaintiff’s employer at the time of the accident.

The defendants filed a supplemental answer alleging that Douglas Fir was an employer under the workmen’s compensation laws; that plaintiff was injured in the course and scope of her employment; and that plaintiff was restricted to the benefits and remedies provided by the compensation laws.

A trial was held before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Jaynes v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Larsen v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Montgomery v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Philpott v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cope v. West American InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Stepney v. INGALLS SHIPBUILDING DIV., ETC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Adamson v. Dalles Cherry Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API