In re Roisman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Roger M. Roisman was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on June 24, 1981. At all times relevant to the misconduct which underlies this proceeding, he maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
In 1987, respondent, an experienced tax lawyer with an LLM in tax law who, since graduating law school in 1975, practiced law at several law firms and was also employed in the tax department of an accounting firm, became an equity partner at the law firm of Stroock & Stroock &…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- In re ChervinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re EppnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re HowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re NovakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of SchnallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of RichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re RachtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re RachtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.