Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Eddleman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1964No. C.D. 2504Published

1Opinion of the Court

63 Wn.2d 775 (1964)

389 P.2d 296

In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WILLIAM R. EDDLEMAN, an Attorney at Law.[*]

No. C.D. 2504.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 13, 1964.

T.M. Royce, for Board of Governors.

Riddell, Williams, Voorhees, Ivie & Bullitt, for respondent.

HALE, J.

When Anton R. Johansen of Fairbanks, Alaska, consulted William R. Eddleman, a Seattle attorney, in June of 1951, neither could foretell the strange series of events soon to follow, much less that their transactions engendered disciplinary proceedings of the gravest nature.

Johansen, a certified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against EddlemanWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Johansen v. EddlemanWashington Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API