Legal Opinion
Manzara v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided August 2, 2011No. SC 91025Published
1Opinion of the Court
343 S.W.3d 656 (2011)
Barbara MANZARA and Keith Marquard, Appellants,
v.
STATE of Missouri, et al., Respondents.
No. SC 91025.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
August 2, 2011.
Irene J. Smith, St. Louis, for Manzara and Marquard.
James R. Layton, Maureen Beekley, Attorney General's Office, Jefferson City, for The State.
Paul J. Puricelli, Robb E. Hellwig, Stone, Leyton & Gershmann, St. Louis, for Northside Regeneration.
MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.
Two taxpayers filed a petition for declaratory judgment challenging the constitutional validity of section 99.1205,[1] the Distressed Areas Land Assemblage Tax…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Wolff; Concurrence · Stith.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.