Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Everette

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 30, 1989No. 1-87-1978Published

1Dissent

JUSTICE McNAMARA,*

dissenting:

I dissent from the majority holding that defendant adequately raised the issue of self-defense and that the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to instruct the jury as to the law of self-defense. I would affirm the judgment entered on the jury verdict finding defendant guilty of murder.

The majority tenuously relies on scanty comments by defendant that, while pointing a loaded gun at the victim, defendant became afraid when he saw the victim holding a beer can and heard Jeffries tell the victim to hit him. These bare statements can hardly imply…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. People v. BratcherIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. JoynerIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. LockettIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. United States v. James E. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API