Legal Opinion

Cantner v. Auerbach

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1897Published

Appeal by defendants from order.of the.General Term of the City Court, reversing an order made at Special Term.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is for deceit, and the complaint alleges that the defendants made certain false representations, therein specifically stated, to the plaintiff with intent to defraud her, upon the faith of which she parted with her money) which was in consequence lost to her. The justice presiding at Special Term,- on the application of the defendants, made an order requiring the plaintiff to make her complaint more definite and certain by stating which of the alleged representations was made by the defendant Oppenheimer, and which by the defendant Auerbach. Upon appeal by the plaintiff the General…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Phelps v. Court of Oyer & TerminerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. New York News Publishing Co. v. National Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Wooden v. StrewNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Badeau v. NilesNew York Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API