Legal Opinion

Claim of Taylor v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 11, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 22, 1999, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant sustained a compensable injury and awarded workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant, a customer service representative, had a history of multiple chemical sensitivity, asthma, rhino sinusitis and irritable bowel when, in 1993, she was exposed to fumes from roof tar that was being applied to the building in which she worked. Her conditions worsened thereafter. In 1995, claimant was exposed to fumes from the insecticide Dursban that was used in her office.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Baxter v. MyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Claim of Leventer v. Yeshiva of FlatbushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Claim of Connon v. W.J. Grande & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim of Harrington v. L.C. Whitford Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Claim of Martin v. Fulton City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Claim of Carlson-Fanelli v. St. Luke's Memorial Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Claim of Bruse v. Holiday InnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API