Legal Opinion
Brown v. Aud
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 18, 2012No. Case No. 2:09-CV-10735PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*610 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, Senior District Judge.
Craig G. Brown, (“Petitioner”), currently-residing in Pontiac, Michigan, has filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he challenges his conviction for possession with intent to deliver trenbolone, M.C.L.A. 333.7401(2)(b)(ii); and possession of trenbolone, M.C.L.A. 333.7403(2)(a)(ii). This Court concludes that Michigan law is unconstitutionally vague as to whether Trenbolone, the drug contained in the FinaplixH that petitioner had in his…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Craig G Brown v. Police Officers Labor CouncilMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015