Scanlon v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.

NEILL, Associate Justice.

The plaintiff in error’s brief is excepted to, and asked not to be considered, by the defendant in error because not in compliance with the rules prescribed by the Supreme Court for briefing causes. The exceptions to the brief are well taken as we shall now proceed to demonstrate.

The plaintiff, in preparing his brief, makes the following preliminary statement of the nature and result of the suit: “John Scanlon, plaintiff in error, sued the G. H. & S. A. By. Co. for its refusal, failure and neglect to furnish plaintiff with the medical and surgical treatment, medi- '…