Edwards v. United Gas Pipeline Co.

ELLIS, Judge.

This case is before us on appeal from a judgment of the lower court dismissing plaintiffs’ suit. There is no real dispute as to the facts, except as to the duration of *109the inconvenience complained of. We adopt the facts as stated by the trial judge in his written reasons for judgment, as follows:

“This is a suit for damages by various owners of camp sites along the Amite River in Ascension Parish against United ■Gas Pipeline Co. and its contractor, Panama, Inc. The plaintiffs allege that as a result ■of certain work performed by defendants they were unlawfully deprived of a right…