Legal Opinion
In Re Crowley
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont
Decided May 7, 2003No. 17-10534PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DETERMINING AMOUNT OF ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DUE TO MORTGAGOR
COLLEEN A. BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge.
I.Issue Presented
The only open issue in this otherwise fully administered chapter 13 case is whether the mortgagees, Virginia O. Bick-ford, Thomas H. Ouelette and James E. Ouelette (collectively referred to as “the Lenders”) are entitled to recover from the Debtor the attorneys fees and costs they incurred for legal services rendered post-confirmation, totaling approximately $15,000. Thomas M. Crowley (hereafter, “the Debtor”) sold the property subject to the Lenders’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clarke v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- In Re S.T.N. Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- In Re Continental Vending MacHine Corp. And Continental Apco, Inc., Debtors. James Talcott, Inc. v. Irving L. Wharton, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanchez v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Sanchez)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re 900 Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- In Re Vernon-WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007