Legal Opinion

In Re: Administrative Subpoena John Doe, D.P.M. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 14, 2001No. 00-4352PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant John Doe (“Doe” or “petitioner”) appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to quash an administrative subpoena issued by the Department of Justice pursuant to a health care fraud investigation. Doe, a podiatrist, is under investigation for an alleged kickback arrangement with two medical testing laboratories. The administrative subpoena, issued pursuant to the Department of Justice’s authority under § 248 of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (“HIPAA”), ordered Doe to turn over a number of documents, including:…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Becker v. KrollCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Steven Warshak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pointe Physical Therapy, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  5. In Re Matter Under InvestigationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API