Legal Opinion
Migdol v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 2002PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered March 19, 2001, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained in a trip and fall on a public roadway, denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion was properly denied on the ground that defendant-appellant’s showing did not conclusively establish its claim that it did not own or maintain the open utility hole where plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell (see, Tiles v City of New York, 262 AD2d 174; Buckle v Buhre…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Morse Shoe Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Tiles v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Buckle v. Buhre Avenue Foods Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kennelly v. Mobius Realty Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Sean M. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Sanford v. 27-29 W. 181st Street Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Henry v. PegueroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Benedetto v. Hyatt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.