Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Fischer (In Re in Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against B. C. Fischer)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2019No. 2019AP000118-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶1 This is a reciprocal discipline matter. On January 14, 2019, the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed a complaint and motion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.22, 1 requesting this court suspend Attorney B.C. Fischer's license to practice law in Wisconsin for a period of 90 days, and direct him to comply with the terms of a Minnesota court order, as reciprocal discipline identical to that imposed by the Minnesota Supreme Court.

¶2 Attorney Fischer and the OLR executed a stipulation, in which Attorney Fischer agrees that he should be suspended for a period of 90 days as discipline…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against FischerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against FischerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. B. C. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API