Legal Opinion
Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 25, 2017No. Court 16-00073; Slip Op. 17-145PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Barnett, Judge:
This matter is before the court following the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or the “agency”) redetermi-nation upon remand in this case. See Final Results of Remand Redetermination (“Remand Results”), ECF No. 51-1.
Plaintiffs Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co., Ltd (‘Weishan”), China Kingdom (Beijing) Import & Export Co., Ltd. (“China Kingdom”), Shanghai Ocean Flavor International Trading Co., Ltd. (“Ocean Flavor”), and Deyan Aquatic Products and Food Co., Ltd. (“Deyan”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this case challenging Commerce’s Final Results in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Diamond Sawblades Mfrs.' Coal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Xiping Opeck Food Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019