In re Barbara S.

The petitioner demonstrated that the appointment of a guardian for Barbara S., the alleged incapacitated person, was necessary to provide for her personal needs and to manage her property and financial affairs (see Mental Hygiene Law § 81.02 [a] [1]; Matter of Adam J. [Gwendolyn J.], 89 AD3d 943, 944 [2011]; Matter of Barbara P. [Doar], 72 AD3d 827, 827-828 [2010]; Matter of Ardelia R., 28 AD3d 485, 486 [2006]). The petitioner further established, by clear and convincing evidence, that Barbara S. was likely to suffer harm because she was unable to provide for her personal needs and management…