Legal Opinion
People v. Hiram
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 30, 2016PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), entered January 21, 2015. The order determined that defendant is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level two risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to defendant’s contention, Supreme Court properly assessed 15 points under risk factor 9 for his nonviolent felony criminal history.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. WrotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. NoriegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. SaraviaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- VASQUEZ, BENANCIO, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017