Legal Opinion

Kletecke v. Lunger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1948No. 21246Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HUNSICKER, J.

In this appeal on questions of law from a judgment for the plaintiffs-appellees, Clarence Kletecke and Marie Kletecke, the defendants-appellants, Samuel Roy Lunger and Hazel Lunger, present one question that is determinative in this appeal, to-wit; Is it necessary that the notice to leave premises, required under Section 209, Par. 6 (c), of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, 50 U. S. C. A., appendix No. 1899, Eviction of Tenants, as amended effective April 1, 1948, Public Law 464, 80th Congress, 2nd Session, state one of the reasons specified in such act in order to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lupi v. FlackOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API