Davis v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, Chief Justice.
A jury convicted Ronald Ken Davis of murder, assessing as punishment a twenty year term of imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, and a $2,500 fine. Davis presents four points of error in his appeal. .
Point of error one contends: “Reversible error occurred when the trial court failed to grant appellant’s objection to the charge.” Intentional murder is a “result of conduct” offense. Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(1) (Vernon 1994) 1 ; see Lugo-Lugo v. State, 650 S.W.2d 72, 81 (Tex.Crim.App.1983). The accused must be found to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Kerry Larnez Rollerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Mario Antonio Bellard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Michael James Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Michael James Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.