Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided April 1, 1998No. 09-96-212-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALKER, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted Ronald Ken Davis of murder, assessing as punishment a twenty year term of imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, and a $2,500 fine. Davis presents four points of error in his appeal. .

Point of error one contends: “Reversible error occurred when the trial court failed to grant appellant’s objection to the charge.” Intentional murder is a “result of conduct” offense. Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 19.02(b)(1) (Vernon 1994) 1 ; see Lugo-Lugo v. State, 650 S.W.2d 72, 81 (Tex.Crim.App.1983). The accused must be found to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  2. Kerry Larnez Rollerson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  3. Mario Antonio Bellard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Michael James Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  5. Michael James Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API