La Barre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
■ Appeal from Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Assumption; Paul ■Leche, Judge. Action by Gustave J. La Barre against the Burton-Swartz Cypress Company. The Baker-Wakefield Cypress Company intervened. Judgment for intervener, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
This case was before us in 1910, and we, being of opinion that the trial judge erred in not deciding the intervention on the merits, remanded the cause for further proceedings according to law. See 126 La. 982, 53 South. 113.
■ ' The plaintiff brought a jactitation suit, based on alleged actual possession of the ¿premises and slander of his title by the defendant. The defendant, after filing several exceptions, further excepted that plaintiff was not, nor had he ever been, in possession of the timber in dispute, and averred that the defendant had itself been in possession :as owner of both…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Saint v. MartelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. Albert Hanson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Labarre v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Burton-Swartz Cypress Co. v. Baker-Wakefield Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- A. V. Neilson Co. v. SiessSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914