Legal Opinion

Simons v. Sanpete County

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 7, 2018No. 20170258-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

Judge Diana Hagen authored this Opinion, in which Judges Michele M. Christiansen and Kate A. Toomey concurred.

1Opinion of the Court

HAGEN, Judge:

¶ 1 This case arises from a tragic car accident that resulted in the death of Brady Simons. 1 Brady's parents, David and Allison Simons (collectively, the Simonses), brought this wrongful death action against Sanpete County in their capacities as heirs and personal representatives of Brady's estate. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Sanpete County, ruling that the county did not owe Brady a duty of care. Because we conclude that the public duty doctrine applies and that Sanpete County did not form a special relationship with Brady, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Rome v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Muthukumarana v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blank v. Garff Enterprises IncCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. Cache Valley Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API