Legal Opinion
Ex parte Yee Hick Ho
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 24, 1929No. 20029PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
This petition for a writ of habeas corpus is filed on behalf of a Chinese woman, Yee Hick Ho, by her brother, Yee Suey Gong. The petition shows that Yee Hick Ho had been denied admission to the United States by the Board of Special Inquiry on the ground that her relationship to her alleged father, a native-born citizen of the United States, had not been established, and that this decision was confirmed by the Board of Review of the Department of Labor on June 21, 1929; notice of this affirmance being transmitted by telegram to San Francisco. Petitioner, her brother,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex parte GouyetDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1909
- Ex parte DomeniciDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
- United States ex rel. Nazaretian v. TodDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Harrington v. SchlotfeldtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- United States Ex Rel. Belardi v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- United States ex rel. Corsetti v. Commanding Officer of Camp Upton, U. S. ArmyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1944
- Hoeppel v. StreetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
- Ahrens v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.