Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Baltimore Teachers Union v. Maryland State Board of Education

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 16, 2004No. 120, Sept. Term, 2000Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

BELL, C.J.

I agree with the majority that the Baltimore Teachers’ Union, American Federation of Teachers, Local 340, AFL-CIO, the plaintiff in the action for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief it filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and the appellant in this Court, has standing to sue the Maryland State Department of Education, one of the appellees, in order to challenge both the Department’s statutory authority to contract with a wholly private concern, to which it ceded virtually complete autonomy, for the operation and management of three…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Peters v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Pressman v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Comptroller of Treasury v. M. E. Rockhill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API