Criollo v. State

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant for the offense of aggravated sexual assault and assessed punishment at ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. Appellant brings two grounds of error. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Appellant, by his first ground of error, complains that a pre-trial identifica*877tion was unnecessarily suggestive so as to taint any in-court identification. On April 26, 1985, appellant raped a twelve-year-old girl. The girl’s ordeal required her to be in appellant’s company for fifty minutes. Based on a description given by the girl, the suspect was identified…