Legal Opinion

State v. Abulaziz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 2019No. A164456Published

1Per curiam

*403Appealing a judgment of conviction for a number of offenses involving controlled substances, defendant assigns error to, first, the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his car upon his arrest; second, the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his house pursuant to a warrant that issued following his arrest; and, in his third and fourth assignments of error, the trial court's imposition of the statutory felony fines on the felony counts based on an erroneous belief that the fines were "mandatory." We reject defendant's first and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SeidelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API