Legal Opinion

Fiel v. City of Racine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1930PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

While the defendant assigns as error the making of certain findings of fact by the court, its whole contention is included in the proposition that upon the undisputed facts it is entitled to dismissal of the complaint on the merits.

As the city was operating the city waterworks and the injury occurred on its land used in connection with such operation, it was acting in proprietary, as distinguished from governmental, capacity, and it is responsible to the same extent that any other property owner would be who permitted a pond of his own creation to remain on his premises under like…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Peters v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Klix v. NiemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Stendal v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Moran v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Overholt v. ViethsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Waters v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  2. Truesdill v. RoachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bass v. Quinn-Robbins Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Erickson v. Village of West SalemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Plotzki v. Standard Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API