People v. Garcia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the prosecution failed to disprove his justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v Acquista, 41 AD3d 491, 491-492 [2007]; People v Santos-Mispas, 38 AD3d 923 [2007]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defendant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt (see…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017