Legal Opinion

Taplin v. Taplin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 1992No. 92-252PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NESBITT, Judge.

The husband appeals a post-dissolution order determining that an addendum to the Marriage Settlement Agreement entered into between the parties was unenforceable. The wife cross-appeals that part of the order determining the husband not responsible for the payment of their son’s medical expenses beyond age eighteen. We find in favor of the husband on both the appeal and cross-appeal.

The parties, Jack C. Taplin and Marsha L. Taplin, were married ten years and had one son, Bradley, when they filed for dissolution in 1978. Paragraph 18 of the settlement provides:

In addition to any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nagymihaly v. ZipesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Spencer v. SpencerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Kisz v. MassryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Silber de Wills v. WillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API