Legal Opinion

State v. York

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2007No. S-06-957PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerrard, J.

NATURE OF CASE

In 2005, Darin C. York was convicted of incest in the district court. On direct appeal, York argued that his trial counsel was ineffective, but conceded that the record was inadequate to review the issue, and the issue was only being raised in order to preserve it for a later postconviction action. The Nebraska Court of Appeals granted the State’s motion for summary affirmance, citing Neb. Ct. R. of Prac. 7B(2) (rev. 2001).

York filed a postconviction motion raising his ineffective assistance of counsel claims. The district court dismissed York’s motion without an evidentiary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Eicher v. Mid America Financial Investment Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. CaddyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. WhitmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. JaegerNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. McKinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. HaasNebraska Supreme Court · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API