Legal Opinion

Hill v. Farmers Union Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1985No. 84-375PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawson Cloninger, Judge.

Appellants raise two points for reversal in this appeal. We find neither persuasive, and we accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.

In February, 1983, appellants filed suit against appellee, alleging that a storm in January, 1978, had caused damage to three chicken houses and a barn. They requested, in their amended complaint, $34,280 in damages to the chicken houses, the 12% statutory penalty, reasonable attorney’s fees, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest as provided by law. The case was tried to a jury, who returned a verdict in the amount of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Insurance v. PaladinoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Haynes v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Garetson-Greason Lumber Co. v. Home Life & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v. WinfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Time Insurance v. BorenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas v. Future DavenportCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Combined Insurance Co. v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API