Legal Opinion
Bolles v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1971No. Civ. 29399PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petitioner John S. Bolles seeks mandate to compel the deposition of Wilmont Nicholson, an expert witness for real party in interest, Barton Development Company. As Barton has stated its intention to call Nicholson as a witness, the work product privilege is inapplicable. (Scotsman Mfg. Co. v. Superior Court (1966) 242 Cal.App.2d 527, 530-532 [51 Cal.Rptr. 511].) Although good cause is required to depose an expert witness (Dow Chemical Co. v. Superior Court (1969) 2 Cal.App.3d 1, 6 [82 Cal.Rptr. 288]; Grand Lake Drive In v. Superior Court (1960) 179 Cal.App.2d 122, 129-131 [3…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Associated Brewers Distributing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Scotsman Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by24 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Brokopp v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kennemur v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.