Legal Opinion
In re Heinze
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1904No. 1,033PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge (orally).
This is a motion to vacate and set aside an order and writ of supersedeas directing the judges of the Circuit Court for the District of Montana to desist and refrain from executing an order adjudging the plaintiffs in error, F. Augustus Heinze, Josiah H. Trerise, and Alfred Frank, guilty of contempt of court, and imposing a certain penalty. From this order entered in the Circuit Court for the District of Montana on the 19th day of December, 1903, a writ of error was allowed by the judge holding the Circuit Court; and on the 21st day of December, 1903, a bond on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Schoonmaker v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hayes v. FischerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Butler v. FayerweatherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re First Nat. Bank of Belle FourcheCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- International Mausoleum Co. v. SievertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Exploration Mercantile Co. v. Pacific Hardware & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
- Bither v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
- In re Kingston Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.