Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1984No. Docket No. 65917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

We agree with Judge Burns that the sentence imposed should run consecutively with defendant’s earlier sentence, but disagree that, because the sentence was consecutive, no credit should be given for the 190 days defendant spent in the county jail awaiting sentencing.

We don’t agree that the granting of the presentence credit, under proper conditions, will destroy the validity of Michigan’s consecutive sentencing law. Our courts have consistently granted credit where the time spent in confinement awaiting trial and prior to the imposition of sentence "bear[s] an intimate and substantial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. FaceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. GroeneveldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. TilliardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. Shirley JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. DonaldsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nestell v. BD. OF EDUC., BRIDGEPORT-SPAULDING COMM. SCH.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API