Legal Opinion

Geisner v. Budget Rent A Car of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 1999No. 75325PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, Judge.

Budget Rent A Car (“Budget”) appeals the summary judgments entered in favor of the Geisner family (“Plaintiffs”) and Thomas E. Hudson (“Passenger”),1 in their actions for equitable garnishment of an insurance policy pursuant to section 379.200 RSMo 1994.2 We affirm in part and reverse in part and remand.

When considering appeals from summary judgments, the record is viewed in the light most favorable to the non-mov-ant, and the non-movant is given the benefit of all reasonable inferences. J.M. v. Shell Oil Co., 922 S.W.2d 759, 761 (Mo. banc 1996). If a genuine issue…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gulf Insurance Co. v. Noble BroadcastSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Pomeroy v. BentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. Weaver v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. J.M. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  5. Bobb v. BobbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Health Care Foundation of Greater Kansas City, Missouri v. HM Acquisition, LLC and HCA, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Carroll v. Missouri Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Carroll v. MO. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK MANAG. ASS'NMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API