Legal Opinion

Ex Parte AmSouth Mortg. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 31, 1996No. 1950550PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves a contest between a payor (AmSouth Mortgage Company, Inc.) and the beneficiary of the payment (Madelaine B. Stewart) wherein AmSouth seeks, under equitable principles, repayment of the moneys it paid to satisfy a debt of Stewart.

The following statement of pertinent, undisputed facts is taken from the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals:

"In August 1992, Madelaine Stewart ('the mother') bought a house for the use and benefit of her daughter, Linda Stewart Sanders ('the daughter'), who was going through divorce proceedings. The mother paid an equity amount of $6,786 and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gresham v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Manning v. WingoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Costanza v. CostanzaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Dothan Nat. Bank v. HollisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Azalea City Motels, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sovereign Bank v. GillisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  4. Cauthen v. YatesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte LawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API