Ex Parte AmSouth Mortg. Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This case involves a contest between a payor (AmSouth Mortgage Company, Inc.) and the beneficiary of the payment (Madelaine B. Stewart) wherein AmSouth seeks, under equitable principles, repayment of the moneys it paid to satisfy a debt of Stewart.
The following statement of pertinent, undisputed facts is taken from the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals:
"In August 1992, Madelaine Stewart ('the mother') bought a house for the use and benefit of her daughter, Linda Stewart Sanders ('the daughter'), who was going through divorce proceedings. The mother paid an equity amount of $6,786 and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gresham v. WareSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Manning v. WingoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Costanza v. CostanzaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Dothan Nat. Bank v. HollisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Azalea City Motels, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Sovereign Bank v. GillisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Cauthen v. YatesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Ex Parte LawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.